Operative innovation planning at regional level

Lately, many regions in Europe are developing Science, Technology and Innovation Plans in order to promote innovation in their bases. These plans are long term (4 to 7 years) and aligned with UE policies.

The objective of planning is always having certain control on investment, but how can we implement these long-term plans?.

The most important way to implement the plans is distributing the money between the different innovation agents implied in the regional innovation processes. One of these agents can be, for example, a network of contact points within innovation. These points are offices that give assistance to any businessman/woman interested in innovating in his/her business. Integrating the activity of several agents is very interesting, specially when the agents come from different sources: technological centers, business asociations, universities and so on.

One of the projects I am working on now is to define an operative plan for one of these networks. The plan is for year 2006, and includes several types of initiatives (network structuring, training, difusion, and research and development promotion). The objective is that the different agents (mostly paid by public funds) work together in order to get to know each other and to be able to aboard bigger projects with bigger impact on society.

Maybe this operative plan and the idea of working together and learning from each other is an added point of motivation for the agents, and it might be a way to identify agents really compromised with innovation in their community. Let’s expect the plan to become a reality in the short term!

Innovation promotion activities in other regions

Due to the project I am working on now, I was looking for innovation promotion initiatives in several regions, that might be considered of reference for some islands like ours, the Balearic Islands.

The reference regions chosen were Madrid and Catalunya (as we work in the Spanish framework), Ireland (as it happens to be the country of reference in Europe in what has to do with tech development) and Hawaii islands (with a population, islands distribution and business profile quite similar to Balearic Islands).

The most remarkable characteristics detected in our little “benchmarking” analysis were:
– The commercial orientation of all public policies in the anglosaxon regions analysed. All web information is focused on selling their technological resources
– The fact that madri+d is a great source of information based on the visibility acquired by the agent that sends its information to the Portal. But the fact that they put their information in the portal doesn’t mean that they work together to generate the information, they just put it there.
– Catalunya has several tech transfer networks, partly financed by regional government. They develop projects through the networks, but regional government has at this moment too much visibility in the networks management
– Hawaii islands have decided long ago to specialize in a few sectors of activities, and they try to focus their RDI infrastructure construction in these sectors. The results are quite good in the sense that your tech industry is limited, but what you do, you might do it very well.

Having all these in mind, I think it would be good for the Balearic islands to specialise in what we do best: tourism, and to create the best infrastructures for this.

The next question is, How do we research, develop and innovate through technology in tourism sector? I think that the answer is: through technology providers. We have to specialize in ICT in tourism (of course, key for all subsectors), but also in food for big communities, furniture for hotels and turistic areas, boat building for leisure time, etc. Furniture are too expensive to export, but design of accurate touristic furniture is exportable for free!!

Innovation Management Process

Many people think that innovating only has to do with inspiration, creativity and good ideas. But Innovation has a lot more to do with hard work, systematization, and ability to implement the good ideas that anyone can have.

With this in mind, we can define and implement in almost any organization an innovation management process, that identifies subprocesses that involve all the organization staff.

The first subprocess of innovation mamagement process is Current situation analysis, this is, try to think about the organization innovation level within its sector (this would be the “innovation degree”) and its attitude towards innovation (this would be the “innovation capacity”).

Once this thinking process has started, it is time to identify and priorityze the innovation projects that will improve the company situation in innovation degree and capacity.

The third step in this process is to find ways for project financing, and this ways can go through public funds, risk capital, banks, private capital and so on. Every way is worth a look.

Next, comes project execution, and you can read my october article “Innovation project management” for further information. This is about clearly defining, executing and closing projects implementation.

The project implementation can lead to some results that you might want to protect through intellectual property rights in order to guarantee the income of your investigation. How do you protect each type of result is what you have to think next.

Finally, we have the last step of letting others know how we play in our organization, this is, Innovation Difusion subprocess. The fact is that our stakeholders want to hear that the organization fights for a better society, and as Rosenberg says the results for society have now to do with force, capital and techology.

All these subprocesses make no sense if they do not come supported by a clear, simple and effective knowledge management process, that will let you know the current situation of your organization, what projects make more sense in this current situation, how can you finance them, who can execute them, how can you protect them and what story do you have to tell about them.

The Innovation Management process is not that complicated, is it?

Innovation project Management

As far as I have experienced, Innovation cannot be successful without being structured as a Project. Companies can develop their day-to-day activities in a fuctional way, this is, each department just doing their job and a manager that integrates the activity of all these departments.

But innovation projects (which are, as I already commented in some other article, the ones that are going to guarantee the market position of the company in a long-term basis)must be structured as projects.

A project can be defined as a group of activities developed in a concrete period of time using several resources and oriented to get determined objectives and results.

There is a lot of Project Management bibliography, but when we talk about small projects there are three phases one has to consider:

DEFINITION AND PLANNING PHASE, oriented to clearly define the objectives of the project and the results expected (which are not usually the same: a project can be “develop a new service”, and results expected could be “enter a new market segment” or “increase sales”), the deliverables that will generate the project, the management structure, the project team and the project planning, once a business case has proved that the project makes sense for our organization.

PROJECT CONTROL AND FOLLOW-UP PHASE, mainly including activities like risk and problem management, change management, documentation management and (last but no least) financing and economical management.

CLOSING PHASE, basically oriented to analyse the project profitability, to prepare knowledge transfer and to evaluate the performance of people in the project.

Common sense is key for project success (just like for any other business activity), but it is amazing the amount of innovation projects launched by companies without a business plan to support them. Let’s start by planning and a lot of money and emotional pain will be avoided!

Seasonality analysis in Minorca (Balearic Islands)

Back from a long vacation period now it’s time to update last InnoBalears information, and this includes gaining the Ateneu de Maó price on tourism research last july. The price will be lended by September, but maybe here we can make a few comments on the research analysis performed and its main conclusions.

Minorca is a flat island in the Mediterranean Sea that forms part of the Balearic Islands, known in Europe by its sun&beach offer for tourists. This island has some particularities that have conditioned its touristic evolution comparing to the other more popular balearic islands: Majorca and Ibiza, but suffers the effects of seasonality in the same way as the other islands.

The study was about seasonality in Minorca island, and the most important conclusions of the study were:
– Certanly there is seasonality in Minorca Island, concentrated in the 6 months between April and October
-The tourism coming from Spain is definitely important in the low season, as most tourists come in this season from Spain
-The seasonality has had a low but continuous depression since year 2000
– In the last 10 years the category of Minorca hotels has improved from low to medium and high category, so the island is ready to host the profile of people that travel in the low season
– One of the reasons of the seasonality is the lack of transport by air or sea with the island
– The alternatives about seasonality in Minorca are three: the creation of new working models, to let the deseasonalization process that has started roll-out or to promote the deseasonalization.
– The promotion of deseasonalization is the most recommended initiative, through the development of a deseasonalization plan that includes all social agents in Minorca.
– The deseasonalization plan might include the participation on a international event at least once every ten years, the promotion of winter products in the target markets and the development of new touristic models designed for the island.

It is time now to promote research and innovation on tourism, and contests like this one are a good starting point.

Topic of the week: The Innovation Process

Lately I’ve had some meetings where a well-situated bussiness man asked me what is really Innovation and how could we talk about Innovation in a tangible way. Innovation is a process. Innovation is an attitude.

To make it tangible, let’s talk about the process. The Innovation process starts with a diagnosis of current situation, any bussiness manager can do this (and does it systematically) on his or her business, this is, staying aware on what happens around my company, how do my competitors move, what techology can make my bussiness easier. To systematyze this process one can subscribe to a good periodical review on the sector, assist to determined events, listen to any provider that comes up with new ideas, support consultants pressure to buy the new bussiness aplication (and buy it if it is really worthy), etc.

Next step is to develop once a year (at least), and according with the analysis performed, a list of innovation projects that could make sense for my company, and characterize them in a developed-enough way so that one can have an idea of how much (more or less) should they cost and how worthy they are for the bussiness. With these criteria on mind one can prioritize the list developed.

The third step includes projects financing, this is, getting the resources that will guarantee projects implementation in the right way. There are several institutions that lend money to develop projects and determined governments give financing facilities, but never lose of mind that the most important risk and the work is for the bussiness manager. This point, financing, might change the initial priorityzation made in our list of projects, as depending on public policies one may be able to finance project number 3 in our list…

Until this point we haven’t actually started to work on the project, we just have thought of it! Now it is when Project Management process starts with its steps of Design, Implementation, and Testing and all the substeps that the concrete project needs, until it is completely implemented and working on the actual environment.

But the Innovation Management process includes two more steps, which are as important as the ones already presented and which are normally ignored by many companies, that do not take the benefits of them. The questions one answers with these two steps are:
1) How do I protect the results of the project? Maybe you don’t want or you can’t protect them in the traditional patent way, but with a confidentiality contract or simply keeping the secret you are already defining the Innovation Project Protection Policy for your company. There are many ways of maintaing the competitive advantage derived of the project, you just have to find which one is good for you.
2) How do I let my customers know that I am working for them and contributing to the development of knowledge in the world with the development of these projects? This is the last step of the innovation process: difusion. Maybe the innovation process developed doesn’t have a direct impact on customers, but sure they are willing to know that every day you work to improve what you do.

I think that if you look at Innovation as a process you can think of tangible results: if you can’t think of them you might not have innovating attitude, which is the basis to survive as a company in this world of today. We will see how to get innovating attitude some other time.

Topic of the week: Spanish bibliography on Innovation and Tourism

As most people know, Spain has traditionally been the third touristic destination in the world (it was the second last year) after USA and France, which theoretically implies certain industry knowledge ready to be exported in our knowledge society, contributing to the Europe of Knowledge development.

Why is this not (very) true? There are several reasons why Spain is not exporting its knowledge on tourism as other countries in Europe are doing with their knowledge in industrial sectors, i. e.:

  • Knowledge in tourism is not patentable as it is in industrial sectors, you can’t protect neither license effectively most of the innovations that might enter the sector
  • New products in tourism are very easily copied by competitors, unless they are supported by a new technology industrially protected (that belongs to the company that has launched the new product, quite a big barrier)
  • It is quite difficult to get information from R+D processes in Tourism, as R+D is not systematized as it is in industrial sectors

Lately (since year 2000) there have been in Spain several initiatives that defend the exportation of knowledge on what we really do best, this is, tourism. In this line of knowledge, COTEC Foundation has published the first Innovation studies at Spanish level, http://www.cotec.es/publica/estudios.html

Also COTEC has published a document on new technologies in tourism, http://www.cotec.es/publica/documentos.html

The Universitat de les Illes Balears has in his portal a document called “Innovación, Transferencia de tecnología y desarrollo en empresas hoteleras. Estudio de las contribuciones de las empresas hoteleras de origen balear a las economías latinoamericanas”, http://www.uib.es/catedra_iberoamericana/publicaciones/empresas_hoteleras/, that highlights the importance of the previous experience of Balearic entrepreneurs when they got to Latinamerica to develop their 365 days/year Sun and Beach hotel businesses.

The Universitat Oberta de Catalunya also has published a document, http://www.uoc.edu/dt/20219/index.html, that introduces an idea that for me is key to future tourism development: the idea that people are going to be willing to pay more for emotions than for technology, and this has to be considered when designing any innovation process in any type of bussiness related to tourism in the future.

As we can see in these examples, in these 5 past years Spain is starting to move on the way of knowledge exportation as a plus to the tourism business creation at national level, even though no licenses for this knowledge are going to be paid. Northern Europe might be Europe of knowledge at industrial level, Southern Europe might be “of non-licensed tourism knowledge”. Let’s go for it.

Topic of the week: OECD Conference on Innovation and Tourism

On September 18-19, 2003 took place in Lugano, Switzerland, the most interesting conference on Innovation and Tourism I found out till now.

I found it through Nathan Rosenberg, one of these American gurus on innovation research that has these details that I love, like answering someone they’ve never heard about that asks for innovation policies on tourism.

Though the content includes more or less expectable conclusions, next papers were specially interesting for me:

  • Explanation of the link between innovation and economic growth, by Rosenberg, also in touristic sectors
  • Point of view by Xavier Décelle (Paris), where he outlines specific features and focus on innovation in tourism
  • Quite interesting explanation of the link between innovation and product improvement by Weiermair (Innsbruck)
  • Presentation of several cases of innovation policy definition or application in Australia, France, Korea and Malta

You can find more information and the conference papers if you type “OECD innovation tourism lugano” on Google. I think any stakeholder on tourism can find a lot of interesting information on these papers.

Topic of the week – Dream Society

Basing on a comment heard from one of the most important investigators in Spain I discovered Rolf Jensen and his Dream Society. The comment was a question: how are the touristic sectors innovating? Traditionally, in industrial sectors, innovation is the result of more or less clever ideas perfectioned by hours of problem solving. It’s about things, so it’s more or less easy: just a matter of time.

What happens in touristic sectors? The type of product we have is about people’s feelings, their emotions, so it is not a matter of time any more, it is about creating new emotions, at that precise moment, through not so direct means (no mahines, no screw-drivers, no computers neither schemas, only people interacting at last).

I read something about Dream Society and my friend Bel Llodrà gave me the reference on Rolf Jensen (www.dreamcompany.dk), the ideologist. I thought I had discovered the panazea of what I had thought till that moment, the maximum component. I read the articles coming up the web page and I read The Dream Society (1999), the book.

The main thesis Jensen presents is that people historically have passed through several phases of needs coverance: hunters and gatherers, agriculture implementation, industrial revolution, society information. What is next, he says (and I agree), is the Dream society, the society where people will be ready to pay more for an emotion than for a determined technology asset. Jensen describes many examples, but one of the most clear to me is the one that speaks of watches: currently all watches are ready to perform perfectly their function in an accurate mode, but one can find a wide variety of prices to perform the same function (tell you what time it is).

He applies this theory to marketing areas, and here we get to the point: industrial revolution or information society have had an enormous impact in the world, and I think the impact Jensen describes is not the impact of a world-wide dimension (as the other historical changes were).

I think the impact of the Dream Society (maybe we should call it the emotion society) will be world-wide, and people will be willing to pay less for technology and more for feelings and emotions than they have ever been. Technology is suppoused to go through, and, from some time ago on, people will want to hear the story behind.

Let’s apply this vision on tourism. We have seen a big change on tourism demands in the last years that has had a big impact on traditional mass tourism destinations. Now that we have realised that what people want to buy are emotions, we will have to change the operations side of the business in order to provide emotions. This is (for example):

  • Telling stories instead of presenting products in the marketing side
  • Asking what type of emotion is the customer feeling when he or she gets our service
  • Changing the satisfaction survey questions (if you look at them you will realise thay are all about functionality (is it clean?), not about feelings (how did you feel when you got in the room: dark?, sad?, nervous?, happy?,…)
  • Training the company people in order to be able to tell stories themselves about who the company is

I think this would be a good beginning for a lasting and loving customer- company relationship and an excellent way to identify and understand how can touristic companies innovate to improve their competition position in the market.